|
3.1. Richard Toft – Economy
Issue 1: What are the views & issues for Forum members?
There are 70-80 organisations in the Forum with great diversity. There hasn’t really been effective communication so have gone for the top issue – SUSTAINABILITY.
Issue 2: Language.
Sustainability in economic development means economic growth!!! – which RT argues is not sustainable for ever. Gloomy economy is an opportunity for 3rd Sector to thrive.
Opportunities ahead include:
1. Zero carbon homes by 2016 (knowledge/skills technology)
2. Reclamation programme (energy reduction). Has 3rd Sector got its share of this?
3. Wood Fuel Strategy (people pushing wood & wood products not pushing technology that uses wood fuel)
4. Feed-in tariffs for renewable energy. (Feed-in tariffs work by offering fixed, premium rates for electricity fed-in to the grid by small scale solar energy producers)
There is a new awareness creeping in which will be further developed by the multi-area agreements.
The question is how to engage? It has been problematic to be effective. Reports were put on the website but there was no feeling that it was being read. The newsletter is very good. As for Networking events – let’s see!
3.2. Jyoti Fernandes - Affordable Housing
Learning jargon for the first year as 3S S&E rep – so kept quiet. Now starting to see where S&E issues fit.
The DSP face pressures from Government to provide more housing. Limited by AONB and environment.
There are not many environmentalists on the board but officers seem very environmentally aware. Impressed!
Reward Money – Groups were asked to think of projects – funding gap around rural projects – so presented ideas. A copy of the report is on the website.
It’s hard getting info from the internet, as being a farmer don’t spend a lot of spare time using it.
Network on ground a lot – conferences, transition town meetings, etc.
Encourage forum members to contact re issues etc.
3.3. Mike Jones – Environment
Involved with the Forum since the beginning, when represented DA21.
The membership of the DSP theme group is mostly statutory body professionals: DCC, AONB, GOSW, and Environment Agency. Quite “high-powered” group, mostly managers, so difficult to feed in 2 hours every few months.
The LAA has its own action plan which MJ finds difficult to relate to.
The West Dorset Partnership is less high powered with more voluntary sector in it, and a much wider agenda; i.e. when you get to District level, environment & sustainability becomes looser, and also action plans and action groups are created.
Environment issues are driven by government policies and funding streams.
Recognised that local govt. partners often have a lot of discussions/decisions that are made outside of partnership meetings. Can understand need for this but felt it leaves the S&E Forum with little chance to participate.
Didn’t feel 3S S&E Forum robust enough at the moment to be given tasks or commissioned by the Theme Group.
MJ expressed concern that not at present networking with other Forum members, which needs to be done so can continue to influence theme group agendas. Both at County and district level there is no barrier to adding things onto agenda, but needs stronger mechanism for reps to do this on behalf of member organisations.
MJ emphasised need for a functioning hub e.g. DA21 given power to organise arguments or regular network meetings.
Dave Thompson, 3S 0-19 Forum rep on Children and Young Peoples Partnership Board, agreed with the concerns raised, especially: Are we representative?
Responded by arguing that all reps can do is tell people
1. Who we are
2. Where we are
3. How to contact us.
Emphasised need for strong, well resourced communication mechanisms. DYA wrote bid for training & capacity building post – needed communications network to work, which 0-19 Forum uses.
|